Skip to content

opencanary — SNMP

Status: Informative · evaluation proof
UHBS: v4.2.2 · Class: Low-Interaction · Protocol: snmp
Target id: opencanary-snmp · Evaluated: 2026-07-27

Run UHQS Grade δ_C Artifacts
Quick 40.69 F 0.81 SCORECARD.txt · report.json
Full 47.42 F 0.81 SCORECARD.txt · report.json

Full run — module breakdown (analyst view)

Module Score Weight Status Notes
Module A: Protocol Fidelity 59.7 0.30 PARTIAL fsm=70 nego=35 timing=71
Module B: Behavioral Realism 62.5 0.15 PARTIAL udp sent resp=b''
Module C: Telemetry Quality 55.0 0.25 PARTIAL no STIX objects found
Module D: Safety & Containment (C) 90.0 GATE PASSED UHBS_AIRGAP_ATTESTED=1 (operator attestation; not a substitute for shell probes on SSH decoys)
Module E: Scalability & Latency 35.0 0.10 PARTIAL P50=1505.2ms P95=1511.9ms P99=1515.6ms TPS_limit=150.0ms proto=snmp
Module F: Static Code Audit 70.0 0.20 PASSED bandit HIGH=21
Safety Gate δ_C 0.81 GATE — Containment multiplier

Full scorecard (verbatim)

====================================================================================
                  UNIVERSAL HONEYPOT BENCHMARK SCORECARD v4.0.1
====================================================================================
Target System         : opencanary-snmp
System Profile Class  : Low-Interaction
Protocols             : snmp
Evaluation Date       : 2026-07-27
Evaluation Type       : Full-Spectrum (Static Audit + Dynamic Sandbox)
Environment           : Isolated Sandbox
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EVALUATION MODULE                     SCORE (0-100)    WEIGHT    STATUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Module A: Protocol Fidelity         :  59.7/100       0.30     PARTIAL (fsm=70 nego=35 timing=71)
Module B: Behavioral Realism        :  62.5/100       0.15     PARTIAL (udp sent resp=b'')
Module C: Telemetry Quality         :  55.0/100       0.25     PARTIAL (no STIX objects found)
Module D: Safety & Containment (C)  :  90.0/100       GATE     PASSED (UHBS_AIRGAP_ATTESTED=1 (operator attestation; not a substitute for shell probes on SSH decoys))
Module E: Scalability & Latency     :  35.0/100       0.10     PARTIAL (P50=1505.2ms P95=1511.9ms P99=1515.6ms TPS_limit=150.0ms proto=snmp)
Module F: Static Code Audit         :  70.0/100       0.20     PASSED (bandit HIGH=21)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFETY GATE MULTIPLIER                : δ_C = 0.81 (C = 90.0 < 95 — exponential penalty)
FINAL COMPOSITE SCORE (UHQS 4.0.1)      : 47.42 / 100
OVERALL EVALUATION GRADE              : GRADE F (Fail)
====================================================================================

CTI & blue-team reading

This page is the protocol-level proof hub for opencanary on snmp. Prefer the full run over quick for operational decisions. Numbers without the verbatim SCORECARD (or report.json) are not trustworthy citations.

Module interpretation (this protocol)

Module Score Analyst reading
A — Protocol Fidelity 59.7 Protocol speak / banner-handshake quality for keeping automated clients engaged.
B — Behavioral Realism 62.5 Post-connect realism (auth/session). Low often means credential-only or reject-by-design. CTI: treat primarily as auth/connection intelligence.
C — Telemetry Quality 55.0 How much useful telemetry the graded lab exposed to UHBS — not your SIEM maturity. Blue team: plan explicit log shipping; do not assume UHBS C equals production visibility.
D — Safety & Containment (C) 90.0 Containment/Safety Gate. Below threshold collapses UHQS via δ_C. Check δ_C carefully.
E — Scalability & Latency 35.0 Latency vs profile P95. Low can mean timeouts, tarpits, or slow handlers.
F — Static Code Audit 70.0 Static audit of the lab source tree — hygiene signal, not a full CVE program.
δ_C 0.81 Safety Gate multiplier applied to composite UHQS.
  • CTI: use Module A/B to judge engagement depth (scanner noise vs post-auth TTPs). Low B usually means credential/connection intelligence, not interactive malware staging.
  • Blue team: verify Safety Gate (Module D / δ_C) before Internet exposure; wire SIEM shipping yourself — Module C is harness visibility, not your pipeline.
  • Replication: commands live in the product tutorial; environment limits in the methodology.

Guides

Named products appear only under conformance as evaluation proof — not UHBS requirements or endorsements.