Scorecard: opencanary — snmp¶

Status: Informative · evaluation proof (not an endorsement)
UHBS: 4.2.2 · Class: Low-Interaction · Protocol / surface: snmp
Target id (lab): opencanary-snmp · Evaluation date: 2026-07-27

Run	UHQS	Grade	δ_C	Proof artifacts
Quick	40.69	F	0.5625	See report hub quick artifacts
Full (authoritative)	47.42	F	0.81	Verbatim SCORECARD below + `report.json` on the report hub

Report hub: opencanary / snmp · Tutorial · Methodology
How to read UHQS: CTI / blue-team guide

Proof: module scores (full run)¶

These numbers are copied from the lab SCORECARD.txt produced by uhbs-lab — not hand-typed summaries.

Module	Score	Weight	Status	Notes
Module A: Protocol Fidelity	59.7	0.30	PARTIAL	fsm=70 nego=35 timing=71
Module B: Behavioral Realism	62.5	0.15	PARTIAL	udp sent resp=b''
Module C: Telemetry Quality	55.0	0.25	PARTIAL	no STIX objects found
Module D: Safety & Containment (C)	90.0	GATE	PASSED	UHBS_AIRGAP_ATTESTED=1 (operator attestation; not a substitute for shell probes on SSH decoys)
Module E: Scalability & Latency	35.0	0.10	PARTIAL	P50=1505.2ms P95=1511.9ms P99=1515.6ms TPS_limit=150.0ms proto=snmp
Module F: Static Code Audit	70.0	0.20	PASSED	bandit HIGH=21
Safety Gate δ_C	0.81	GATE	—	Containment multiplier applied to UHQS

How CTI / blue team should read this¶

Module	Score	Analyst reading
A — Protocol Fidelity	59.7	Protocol speak / banner-handshake quality for keeping automated clients engaged.
B — Behavioral Realism	62.5	Post-connect realism (auth/session). Low often means credential-only or reject-by-design.
C — Telemetry Quality	55.0	Telemetry visible to the UHBS lab harness — not a claim about your SIEM pipeline.
D — Safety & Containment (C)	90.0	Containment / Safety Gate. Below threshold collapses UHQS via δ_C.
E — Scalability & Latency	35.0	Latency vs profile P95. Low can mean timeouts, tarpits, or slow handlers.
F — Static Code Audit	70.0	Static audit of the graded source tree — hygiene signal, not a full CVE program.
δ_C	0.81	Safety Gate multiplier applied to composite UHQS.

CTI: use module notes to judge what attacker activity you can actually observe (auth-only vs interactive vs tarpit).
Blue team: verify Safety Gate (Module D / δ_C) and wire real log shipping before Internet exposure.
Do not cite UHQS without the verbatim SCORECARD or report.json from the report hub.

Verbatim full SCORECARD¶

====================================================================================
                  UNIVERSAL HONEYPOT BENCHMARK SCORECARD v4.0.1
====================================================================================
Target System         : opencanary-snmp
System Profile Class  : Low-Interaction
Protocols             : snmp
Evaluation Date       : 2026-07-27
Evaluation Type       : Full-Spectrum (Static Audit + Dynamic Sandbox)
Environment           : Isolated Sandbox
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EVALUATION MODULE                     SCORE (0-100)    WEIGHT    STATUS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Module A: Protocol Fidelity         :  59.7/100       0.30     PARTIAL (fsm=70 nego=35 timing=71)
Module B: Behavioral Realism        :  62.5/100       0.15     PARTIAL (udp sent resp=b'')
Module C: Telemetry Quality         :  55.0/100       0.25     PARTIAL (no STIX objects found)
Module D: Safety & Containment (C)  :  90.0/100       GATE     PASSED (UHBS_AIRGAP_ATTESTED=1 (operator attestation; not a substitute for shell probes on SSH decoys))
Module E: Scalability & Latency     :  35.0/100       0.10     PARTIAL (P50=1505.2ms P95=1511.9ms P99=1515.6ms TPS_limit=150.0ms proto=snmp)
Module F: Static Code Audit         :  70.0/100       0.20     PASSED (bandit HIGH=21)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFETY GATE MULTIPLIER                : δ_C = 0.81 (C = 90.0 < 95 — exponential penalty)
FINAL COMPOSITE SCORE (UHQS 4.0.1)      : 47.42 / 100
OVERALL EVALUATION GRADE              : GRADE F (Fail)
====================================================================================

Replication¶

Re-run commands are in the tutorial. Environment and limitations are in the methodology.

Product names appear only under conformance as evaluation proof — not UHBS requirements.